In a previous post, I addressed the issue of trees in the Voynich manuscript – or rather its possible lack thereof. Many people understandably believe that the Voynich plants are herbs, not trees. This is caused by, and has implications for, an expected link between the Voynich plants and the medieval herbal traditions.
Of course there are exceptions, but medieval manuscript makers were mostly concerned with the medicinal properties of plants (which meant mostly herbs). You won’t find many medieval manuscript illustrating plants just for the benefit of botanical science. Other considerations, like a plant’s economical value or aesthetic appeal and even culinary applications, were relatively unimportant in medieval herbals, and if there were any they would always be subordinate to medicinal applications.
In my first post on the subject of trees, I argued that there are trees in the manuscript, but that we don’t recognize them easily for two reasons:
- With just plant drawings which occupy an entire page each, we have no indication of scale at all. We have to guess whether something is ten centimeters or ten meters in height.
- There is a clear case where people agree that an oak-like tree is shown as the host of a vine. Yet, this tree looks exactly like an oak twig or a young shoot, rather than a full tree.
The ancient customs of Flemish stick farmers
The cause for this second post arrived a bit later, as it happens, during a stroll in the local forest. Farmers had just been harvesting a large amount of long, straight sticks, which lay along the paths in bunches, looking somewhat like this:
As it turned out when I looked into this, the sticks were harvested from pollarded willows. These trees are sawed off either near the ground or at a height of about two meters in order to encourage the rapid growth of new shoots. They are a common sight in the Dutch and Belgian countryside. Below, willows with new shoots and some from which the shoots have been harvested.
The sticks are used for a variety of purposes, including weaving baskets and building natural fences:
Of course, the willow is not the only species suitable for coppicing, as the technique is called. The wiki lists the following species for southern Britain, though different practices would exist in other areas:
In southern Britain, coppice was traditionally hazel, hornbeam, beech, ash or oak, grown amongst oak or sometimes ash or beech standards. In wet areas alder and willows were used. These coppices provided wood for many purposes, especially charcoal, which before coal was economically significant in metal smelting. A minority of these woods are still operated for coppice today, often by conservation organisations, producing material for hurdle-making, thatching spars, local charcoal-burning or other crafts.
Coppicing was a common part of everyday life until fairly recently. From before the Middle Ages until the late 19th century, most woodlands were coppiced.
Culturally, coppicing played a huge role in the development of our society and its technology. Coppicing has been traced back to as far as Neolithic times (c4000 BC). Historians believe that during the medieval period over half of the woodlands in the UK were managed through coppicing. [1]
In fact, it was so common for forests to be heavily managed, that specialized wildlife organizations encourage coppicing techniques in order to restore forests to their “original” state. Depending on the type of shrubs or trees, they have to be cut every two to ten years. That is, to maintain the forest in its original state of high-intensity maintenance.
Examples
The point relevant to Voynich studies is that any pre-modern person would have recognized and understood the appearance and purpose of coppiced trees. Modern viewers might know what a cut tree looks like, but they will be less likely to recognize at a glance the signs and purpose of coppicing. Hence, before we get to the Voynich part, I will show some more images of coppiced trees. Experienced Voynich researchers will see from a mile away what will come next.
You get the point. A fully grown tree is cut, leaving the root system alive. As a result, the strong roots will quickly shoot out lots of straight, new branches in order to produce enough leaves. It is the most sustainable and effective way to produce specific wood resources.
So what does all of this have to do with the Voynich?
I believe that a case can be made for the presence of coppiced trees in the Voynich manuscript. A particularly strong example is f.9r.
The image appears to show a cut trunk from which fresh shoots spring. One could argue that this is a herb, in which case the entire brown part is the underground root, which has a white “flat top” from which several growths emerge. However, in my opinion the drawing is more properly described as roots with an above-ground stump with fresh branches. This is illustrated in the image below; the top part shows the plant as if it was a coppiced trunk, with the imaginary ground line indicated in red and the underground part in orange.
The bottom half shows what the ground line would look like if this were a herb.
Now if we assume for a moment that this is indeed a coppiced tree with new shoots, then it is in fact a damn fine representation of one. If I am familiar with the practice – like anyone before say the 19th century would have been – then I would recognize it at a glance.
In fact, the aspects it gets right are stunning. Have a look at the image below. The two coppiced stumps I add are freshly cut, which means that they have no new shoots yet, but this will give us a better view of what’s going on.
First of all, notice that the tops are cut at an outward angle in order to prevent rainwater from gathering in the middle and causing the tree to rot. A consequence of the cutting pattern is that the stump is generally wider at the top, as is also the case in the Voynich image. Secondly, note how the Voynich trunk’s top outline wonderfully captures the organic shape of half-merged tree stems. And finally, perhaps most obviously, coppicing perfectly explains why the top of the Voynich trunk is white and the sides are brown: the inside of a trunk is generally lighter than the bark.
The implications
There is a tree trunk on f.9r, so what? Why is this such a big deal? Well, there are a number of consequences which should affect the way we look at the Voynich plant sections.
- In coppicing, the new growths are the product, and those are generally used for timber, fuel, construction, weaving and a large amount of other applications. For example, oak was coppiced to harvest its bark for tanning. This might imply that the focus of the Voynich plants, unlike the standard medieval herbal, is not exclusively on medicine but rather on general practical or commercial goods (which may include any medicinal value as well).
- There should come a general shift in Voynich research from medicinal herbs to useful plants.
- The plants that are shown with a coppiced trunk are likely ones that were carefully managed and benefited from coppicing techniques. It goes without saying that coppicing was known as a traditional way of harvesting plant materials outside of Europe as well. For example, cinnamon trees are coppiced after the second year to make them produce more stems – and hence more of their valuable bark.
- And finally, the person who first made the Voynich drawings knew very well what he was doing.
Some more Voynich examples
There are a number of plants in the VM which appear to be coppiced. The following is just a selection of the examples, there are too many to show and discuss here.
Finally, there are also several examples in the small-plants section.
Of course, there is much more to the Voynich plants than this, but I hope that this post may have added a new, and hopefully fruitful concept to our collective Voynich vocabulary.
NOTES
[1] See http://coppicecrafts.blogspot.be/2014/01/the-art-of-coppicing.html
[2] Source: http://theurbancountryman.weebly.com/blog/coppicing-for-woodland-management
[3] https://www.forestry.gov.uk/forestry/infd-6zpgub
This is a very interesting approach ! I admit that this type of woodland managment has been completely unknown to me. I feel a bit sheepish about it because I live near a fairly well-known forest (historically).
Just for fun, something like that can happen if you train trees the wrong way 😉
LikeLike
Yeah I must say that I also didn’t know much about this before looking it up. Apparently forests around settlements were more like wood farms before the industrial revolution.
It makes sense in a way, since they relied heavily on wood as a resource. Even oaks were coppiced on something like 50-year cycles in order to provide timber and ship masts in a sustainable way. Without these methods, high demand would have led to quick deforestation, as happened to cedars used for shipbuilding in antiquity.
I was also surprised to see how some accurate details of this technique are represented in the VM imagery, despite the somewhat rudimentary quality of the drawings.
LikeLike
Yes very interesting, and also who I meet here 😉
A few more hints and I will guess the historic “sylva” of bi3mw.
So, how about “medicinal trees and shrubs”?
LikeLike
It’s almost certain that a small or large number of Voynich plants is included because of medicinal properties. I have no doubt about that, since medicine and botany are largely interwoven.
The point I’m trying to make is twofold: first, the Voynich plants likely extend beyond the realms of medicine and herbs. Herbal manuscripts were generally made with a very specific purpose, which was to allow the user to select and identify herbs for medicinal use. Or to allow a rich patron to read about said herbs and look at pretty pictures 🙂 The VM has the looks and feel of a practical guide, but it certainly breaks outside of the boundaries of the genre.
And second, even though the drawings look absurd at first, the one who made them knew his business. We just have to learn the visual language before we can fully appreciate what he’s doing.
LikeLike
Koen,
As you say, just a few among the many plants and trees which are able to regenerate rapidly after being cut were forced to do so – and for specific purposes. If you are correct in supposing that all the VMS drawings which use this motif refer to trees used for coppicing then the range of possibilities is nicely limited.
On the other hand, if the maker intended us to read the more general rather than the more limited reference here – that is, that it refers to plants having that ability, not just to those artificially forced to produce new growth – then the number of possibilities increases.
I cannot see how folio 13r can be taken as reference to any but the Musaceae since it a representation remarkably clear, accurate, detailed and (for the Vms) literal. The banana plant is technically a herb, not a tree according to our classification and its ‘wood’ doesn’t admit such uses as making hurdles etc. So I read the more general sense as the one intended (i.e. ‘rapidly regenerates’) where you now take the narrower (‘a coppice tree’).
Guess it’s another which has to wait for a final verdict on interpretation of the written part of this text. I’d rather bet on which of us is more correct than bet on when the linguists and cryptographers will get a result. 🙂
LikeLike
Diane
Yes, I think it’s best to keep the options open here. Also, looking at the examples again, there are at least two different motifs. There are those which in my opinion are a clear reference to coppicing, whether this is to be taken in a narrow sense or an extended sense as you propose.
But I’m not sure if the banana and f44v mean the same. There you get many smaller “cuts” which each have one leaf.
The best examples of coppicing are 9r, 14r, 36r and 45v.
Now all of this raises another question though. Both “regenerates quickly” and “can be coppiced” are pieces of information which are important to someone who wishes to grow and manage the trees, and not as much to someone who just wishes to collect or buy materials. Almost like a guide for a plantation owner…
LikeLike
I was totally unaware of this type of sustainable management, too. I just learned that I live less than a kilometer away from the remnants of a historical “-Busch”, a “Niederwald” that was in use by the population until 1840. A few oaks survived, and propably only because they were located in the death zone during the cold war. Generally in middle europe the practice seems to only have ended after WWII. Maybe due to the Marshallplan, ERP?
Bark harvesting for medicinal purposes is ages-old, and a sustainable way seems to make sense, but I have been unable to find a link thus far. Medieval horticulture research suffers from a lack of sources, it seems, btw.
Another use for bark that comes to my mind is in tannery.
This is of course coincidential and also a shot into the blue, but for uses beyond medical I’d be interested if coppiced material could have been used for making potash, potassium before kalium was recognized and mined for. Aschebrennen is a quite “lossy” process, so a lot of input material is necessary if made from wood instead of seaweed, or better, Salzkraut. Some trees might be more suitable for certain purposes than others.
Historically, harvesting-off seems more famous (for creating desert like landscapes) than sustainability, though.
Funnily there is no direct german verbal equivalent for “coppicing”. “Stutzen”, or simply “schneiden” would maybe meet it best, but that translates to “pruning”.
It’s sometimes unclear when to call something a tree or a shrub, and some herbs are treated like shrubs. All need heavy pruning in cultivation.
I also happen to live not very far from world’s oldest Arboretum, which is a very beautiful place to visit. Now I have some questions for next time 🙂
LikeLike
About the German term, it may be this:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%B6pfen_(Landwirtschaft)
In Dutch a specific word would be “knotten”. A complication is that average people nowadays only know this in one particular context since it is always used on a specific type of willow (Dutch: knotwilg) which is typical for the landscape. Generally the trees’ tops are sawed off after they have reached a height of about two meters. The stem will then sprout a whole lot of straight sticks.
What I didn’t know before researching this post was that there are also plantations where they saw off this same tree at ground level, resulting in the sticks seemingly growing from the field. The sticks produced in this way seem to be somewhat thinner and more flexible, which is why they are preferred for things like basket weaving instead of fencing.
And indeed, one of the difficulties in Voynich research is that the vast majority of 15th century European “plant books” are medicinal herbals. This means that any comparisons we find there will often only be of indirect relevance.
LikeLike
While “Köpfen” does not meet it exactly, it turns up a rather interesting reference:
Alnus glutinosa, Schwarz-Erle, Black Alder (don’t bother for the english WP article) used to be cultivated* exactly this way. Alder is kown as a very magical, mythological, medicinal etc. tree (or rather a large shrub / treelet, if cultivated in the form of “Aurea”). I’ll just sow a few of my gleanings, transliterated & shortened:
Pliny in Naturalis historia: “Leaves with hot water cure ulcers (tumors)”
Hildegardis in Physica: “Apply young leaves for curing ulcerous skin”
Heidelberg, Cpg 666: “Dried and powdered leaves for cleansing wounds”
Hieronymus Bock, Nicolaus Agerius in Kreütterbuch: ”Leaves … bark … tea, against ’heat damage’, tooth-ache and pharyngitis” (the latter condition we still find treated with alder extract based medicinal preparations, today).
Bark / twig harvesting … 16-20% tannine content … tanning & dyeing (yellowish/orange, but see “dyers-” subsp. for red) … Sumac replacement … galls … ink …
Ceterum censeo: Indicator plant … settles on “Seifen” (young placer deposits) … alluvial sands … gold, platin, sapphires etc.. let’s stop here (while we could switch to Elder, now..).
Don’t throw the young shoots into the fireplace, too quickly. It mainly seems to be a problem of modern nomenclature and taxonomy – e.g. the term *cultivation may need refinement in this case – what would you call “stimulation of useful features by non-invasive and sustainable methods in natural habitats”?.
LikeLike